How soon do you agree to a date online dating

Online dating literature review

Online Dating and Problematic Use: A Systematic Review,How is this guide organized?

 · Literature Review on Online Dating. In a study of the relationship between online dating and mating, Couch and Liamputtong () performed a study on the use of the ONLINE DATING LITERATURE REVIEW 4 partners and less intent on catching potential mates because of too much information and too many choices. This is often referred to  · From Academia: Gender Differences in Online Dating (Literature Review) Written by Scott Harvey. 5th January A ResearchGate paper analysed the existing problematic use of online dating is scarce, the structure of this present review has been designed to assess and discuss relevant factors related to online dating use that may serve as the  · Physical attractiveness is the key criteria for men; while women, being much more demanding, prioritize socio-economic attributes when choosing a male partner. ... read more

Regarding psychological characteristics, it appears that high sociability and high rejection—sensitivity are associated with higher use of online dating services. The studies reviewed suggest that there are some features in online dating services i. sites and apps that could enhance the chances of deception and decrease the quality of long-term relationships. Nonetheless, there are some methodological weaknesses e.

the use of non-validated psychometric instruments, and non-representative samples that should be amended in future research so that the internal and external validity of these findings are increased. As to the design, the research should consider longitudinal approaches to help establish the direction of causality i. is relationship quality affected by online dating or are there underlying factors that directly affect relationship quality.

Considering the association that exists between specific personality correlates and patterns of use, a total of seven studies Blackhart et al. All the studies assessed used quantitative and cross-sectional methods. Blackhart et al. This association was also reported in a study of US heterosexual participants Findings suggested that those high in sensation-seeking used online dating apps to look for casual partners and romantic dates Chan The authors also found associations between trust towards people, sensation-seeking, and higher use of smartphones with increased dating app use, and a direct relationship between smartphone use and dating app use.

Arguably, there may be an association between excessive smartphone use and dating app use. They reported a positive correlation between sexual permissiveness and dating app use for casual sex dates. The authors also found that the odds ratio for likelihood of being an active user increased by 1. Thrill of excitement also works as a motivation for online dating app use for sensation-seeking individuals.

There appears to be agreement concerning the relationship between some personality traits and the motives for online dating use Sumter and Vandenbosch identity, social, companionship, distraction, intercourse, status, and relationship with blended items from three different validated scales: the General Internet Use Scale Charney and Greenberg , Television Viewing Motives Scale Rubin and Social Networking Scale Guessennd et al.

Results provided significant correlations between personality traits and online dating gratifications. For example, neuroticism was significantly related to identity gratification, which means that individuals high in neuroticism pursue the creation of their own identity by being free to choose what to show to others.

Openness to experience was found to be associated with being social when using online dating sites. Disagreeable individuals were found to use online dating sites to be social and to search for companions. Conversely, those who scored low in disagreeableness were found to use online dating sites with peer pressure i. Furthermore, conscientiousness was correlated with finding a romantic relationship.

Also, the authors included sex and sexual orientation in the model in order to relate them to personality traits and dating gratifications. Significant associations were found between homosexual participants and gratifications of relationship and sex. Additionally, homosexuals were found to score higher on neuroticism, together with heterosexual women. It has already been noted that neurotic individuals aim to form their own identity via online dating sites Clemens et al.

In terms of personality traits, the authors reported that participants low in openness to experience were more likely to misrepresent themselves on online dating sites in order to appear more appealing.

Neurotic individuals, who have been claimed to pursue control over their online representation, were not found to misrepresent themselves Hall et al.

Regarding attachment styles, Chin et al. A multivariate regression analysis was performed utilising data from the Attachment Style Questionnaire Simpson et al. Results showed differences in use depending on the type of attachment and reported those with anxious attachment patterns tended to use online dating more than avoidant types.

The results in this section indicate that there is a relationship between the use of dating apps and personality characteristics, such as low conscientiousness, high sensation-seeking, and sexual permissiveness. The relationship suggests that individuals high in sensation-seeking and sexual permissiveness use dating app services for casual sexual encounters.

Further research should study the relationship between sensation-seeking and sexual permissiveness with the use of dating apps. Also, there appears to be an association between neuroticism and higher online dating use. However, only two studies have reported a clear positive correlation Chin et al.

Regarding the limitations of the studies, all of them were cross-sectional; therefore, no causality or directionality of the findings can be inferred. This section reviews risks in relation to the use of online dating. A total of ten studies were identified. There were six qualitative studies Best and Delmege ; Couch and Liamputtong ; Couch et al.

Three of the studies were purely quantitative Cali et al. Additionally, two studies utilised female-only samples Cali et al. According to the studies found in relation to perceived risks, there appears to be agreement on the existence of potential dangers of online dating.

Vandeweerd et al. There were some shared perceived risk categories identified by these two studies: lying, finding people with ulterior motives, and aggression. online vs. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions and were given a description. Following this, they were asked to complete the Dating Self-Protection Against Rape Scale Moore and Waterman and some items on internet usage.

After analysis, results showed a difference between the two groups. Online dating scenario participants placed more importance on self-protective behaviours, and those who had never used online dating before scored the highest in self-protective behaviours. Here, it appears that time spent using online dating mitigates the perceptions of risks which could lead to the underestimation of potential dangers.

Further research needs to verify this hypothesis. Choi et al. The data showed that users of dating apps were more likely to have been sexually abused than non-users in the past year. The use of online dating apps was also associated with lifetime sexual abuse, especially among sexual minorities i. These data need to be interpreted cautiously because the data did not discern whether the abuser was met online or offline. Further studies should discriminate whether or not the abuser was met via dating apps.

Among adolescent populations, Sánchez et al. The first study was qualitative, with focus groups including 16 participants eight males with ages ranging from 14 to 17 years. The focus group data analysis resulted in identifying several factors which were later included in the development of a scale second study.

Couch and Liamputtong interviewed 15 participants from Melbourne Australia via online chat, eleven males aged between 24 and 44 years.

In a later study, Couch et al. After conducting the interviews via an online chat platform, they found that participants identified risks such as deceit, sexual risks, emotional and physical risks and risks of encountering dangerous and untrustworthy people.

Additionally, one of the key features of online dating i. Heino et al. Another study carried out with 38 older Slovenian adults between 63 and 77 years of age 18 females found that participants used economic metaphors e. the best of what the market offers, to be back in the market when speaking about their experience of online dating Erjavec and Fišer Based on these findings, further research could study the relationship between objectification of others and self in online dating use and mental health problems.

Overall, the studies covered in this section demonstrate that online dating is perceived as more dangerous than traditional offline dating. The perceived risks appear to coincide across studies, mainly involving deception, sexual harassment, and finding untrustworthy people. However, only one study Choi et al. There is agreement on the general perception of risks and the objectification effect by filtering through multiple profiles. Findings come mainly from qualitative studies; therefore, they are informative, but further analysis on more representative populations using quantitative approaches is needed to support these results.

There is an important body of research studying impulsive behaviours mainly in the form of risky sexual choices in the context of online dating. Consequently, a total of ten studies in relation to online dating were identified examining risky sexual behaviours Choi et al.

All the studies were quantitative and cross-sectional Choi et al. In terms of samples, six of the studies focused exclusively on men who have sex with men MSM Chow et al. Of those, at least were male participants ten did not answer the gender question. The aim was to examine the relationship between smartphone dating apps and risky sexual behaviours i.

condomless sex. In the first study Choi et al. Additionally, the use of dating apps for a period longer than 12 months was associated with having casual condomless sex in the most recent sexual interaction. In the second study Choi et al. For example, dating app users and alcohol drinkers were less likely to use a condom during sex alcohol consumption was categorised as current drinker or non-drinker. Being bisexual, homosexual, or female was significantly correlated with being less likely to have used a condom during the most recent sexual interaction.

Regarding homosexual populations, Chow et al. Findings reported that MSM who used dating apps were 1. Additionally, a significant relationship between alcohol and drug use and condomless sex was found drugs and alcohol consumption data were collected via an item based on a retrospective account of the last three months in conjunction with dating app use. In contrast to these findings, Heijman et al. The results found no significant association with dating app use and condomless sex among HIV-negative users; conversely, HIV-positive users were found to be more likely to perform anal sex without a condom, indicating that there are differences in risky sexual choices by MSM in the context of online dating.

However, this association was not significant after inclusion of partnership characteristics in the multivariate model e. HIV status, ethnic origin, and age. The authors suggested that knowing more information about partners i. HIV status, lifestyle concordance, and ethnic origin works as a mediating effect for condomless sex in the context of online dating. In a previous study with MSM in the Netherlands, Hospers et al. Nonetheless, Whitfield et al. In order to explain the factors involved in the decision-making of sexual risky behaviours among MSM who actively use online dating platforms, Kok et al.

behavioural beliefs about the use of condoms , subjective norms i. normative beliefs , and perceived control i. Fantasising about condomless sex was found to have a direct effect on intention to carry out condomless sex intention is considered by the theory of planned behaviour to be the most reliable predictor of behaviour Ajzen ; Kok et al.

In relation to online dating apps, it could be argued that specific structural characteristics e. chat, sharing pictures may increase fantasising about condomless sex. However, further research is needed to relate the aforementioned structural characteristics of dating apps and sexual behaviour. Regarding behavioural changes among computer online dating and smartphone dating apps, Jung et al. online dating site to smartphone access i. As a consequence of computer-to-smartphone shift, the authors noted that men had increased impulsivity i.

they became even less deliberate in terms of quantity of messages sent and their targets. For example, viewing profiles of individuals from a different ethnic background increased by Therefore, according to these results, there appears to be an effect on the ubiquity factor to becoming more engaged and presumably increasing the chances of developing a misuse pattern of online dating services when using smartphone dating apps rather than computer-based online sites.

According to March et al. the act of being provocative, offensive or threatening [Bishop ] on the Tinder app. Taking these two studies together Jung et al. Overall, the results presented in this section suggest that online daters have higher chances of behaving impulsively in comparison to non-users in terms of risky sexual choices.

The behaviours covered were mostly of sexual nature and focused mainly on homosexual male populations MSM. Nonetheless, it could be beneficial for the sake of generalisability to know if these results can be replicated across individuals with other sexual orientations i. heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual women. In the final selection of studies, there are only two studies that have examined the relationship between online dating and substance use addiction Boonchutima and Kongchan ; Choi et al.

sex addiction and online dating Zlot et al. Boonchutima and Kongchan surveyed a sample of MSM from Thailand three out of four respondents aged 18 to 35 years and asked about their online dating app use, sexual history, drug use history and intention of using drugs.

Furthermore, one in three substance users Therefore, according to the findings, there may be an association between illegal drug use and condomless sex. Nevertheless, it should be noted there is no mention regarding what type of illicit drugs was used. Regarding alcohol consumption and online dating, Choi et al. In a later study, Choi et al. more than a year and recreational substance use in conjunction with sex. Again, the specific substances were not mentioned and were coined as recreational drugs alcohol was independent of the recreational drugs category.

It would be useful for further research to specify the respective substances as the scope of illicit or recreational drugs can be extensive. According to these studies, the co-occurrence of substance use with risky sexual behaviour in the context of online dating was indicated. Nonetheless, caution needs to be used with regard to this assumption because the assessed samples were skewed towards MSM; therefore, generalising the results to the general population is not possible.

In relation to behavioural addictions in the context of online dating, Zlot et al. In order to collect data, participants answered a series of validated psychometric instruments that were integrated in an online questionnaire. Measures included the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Liebowitz , the Sensation Seeking Scale Zuckerman et al. Following the analysis, associations were found between users of dating apps and higher scores on sexual addiction measures in comparison to non-app users, as well as a positive correlation between social anxiety and the use of smartphone dating.

Again, the relationship between anxiety-tendency factors and the use of online dating was supported as was mentioned in the preceding sections. The scarcity of the literature limits the conclusions.

However, the findings can be considered as a guide for future study examining substance use and other types of behavioural addictions with online dating.

There appears to be a relationship between substance use among partners who have met via online dating, at least among MSM who use dating apps. In relation to substance use and online dating among heterosexual populations, data come from only one study that reported no direct relationship Choi et al. In terms of behavioural addiction, only sex addiction has been studied and it was found to be related to dating app use Zlot et al. To date, only two studies have exclusively focused on problematic online dating.

Both studies were quantitative and developed validated psychometric scales Orosz et al. One of the studies used a mixed-methods approach Orosz et al. The two studies solely focused on one specific dating app i. In the first study, Orosz et al. This self-report measure is based on the components model of addiction Griffiths , which comprises six characteristics of addiction: salience, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict and relapse.

In the second study, Orosz et al. sex, love, self-esteem enhancement, and boredom. The results were weak in relation to personality factors and the four main motivations for Tinder use. However, self-esteem enhancement was related to Tinder use. The results showed that relatedness frustration i. needs not met by affection and care from relevant others predicted the motivation of self-esteem enhancement which was found to be one of the motivations associated with problematic use of Tinder, together with the sex motive.

Overall, the studies presented in this section are not sufficient in terms of quantity to consider online dating addiction as an entity. However, the studies are of general interest to researchers considering the widespread use of dating apps and provide insight in relation to factors such as self-esteem and sex-searching that may be related to the development of problematic patterns of use.

Even though there is a scarcity of literature examining problematic use of online dating, there is some research that appears to support the findings presented in this section. Further study is needed to consider the relevant factors that have been suggested as predictors of problematic use, self-esteem and sex-searching motives, with a cross-cultural approach in order to inform of possible cultural differences in relation to problematic use.

Also, other dating apps could be subject of study to examine if there are any differences in terms of motives that could lead to problematic use. The present paper reviewed the literature concerning the use of online dating focusing on problematic online dating computer-based and smartphone apps , characteristics of users e.

risks associated with the use of online dating, impulsivity, use of drugs in conjunction to online dating. Due to the lack of previous literature on problematic use of online dating, socio-demographic and psychological characteristics e. gender, age and personality are informative with regard to which specific individual characteristics relate to greater use of online dating.

Even though longer-time use cannot be considered as problematic or addictive per se , it could be a reference point for future research in the field. The growth in this service may be due to different reasons, and as with other forms of internet use e. social media use, online gaming, online shopping, etc.

Nevertheless, online dating developers have acknowledged that design is made to engage the user and increase monetisation of the business Jung et al. Even though the design of dating apps has not been studied in the field of addiction, previous literature examining SNS use suggests that user interaction such as scrolling, tapping, and typing is related to smartphone addiction Noë et al. Considering that dating apps have a similar user interaction design i.

Further research is needed to confirm such a speculation. In terms of personality correlates, reviewed studies pointed out that sociability, anxious attachment style, social anxiety, lower conscientiousness, higher sensation-seeking, and sexual permissiveness were associated with higher use of online dating sexual permissiveness and lower conscientiousness have also been related to sex-searching in the context of online dating Blackhart et al.

Likewise, SNS research has suggested that higher extraversion, social anxiety, loneliness, and lower self-efficacy are related to Facebook addiction Atroszko et al. Neurotic correlates i.

social anxiety, neuroticism, and anxious attachment style of SNS and online dating research have been found, with these characteristics having been associated with higher use, operationalising the definition of neuroticism as being highly anxious, depressed, and low in self-esteem Eysenck , and it could be argued that some of the motives of use claimed for these individuals could work as a form of avoidance or escapism from distress e. distraction , leading to a negative reinforcement of the behaviour i.

online dating that could heighten the chances of developing any kind of misuse or excessive usage pattern. Furthermore, the relationship between anxiety traits and neuroticism has been upheld by a great body of research in behavioural addictions Andreassen et al. Therefore, considering this association, it is recommended that future research should study this relationship with the problematic use of online dating.

To date, only one study has related self-esteem enhancement to problematic use of Tinder Orosz et al. Considering that anxious attachment, and generally anxiety-tendency correlates i. neuroticism are associated with lower measures of self-esteem Lee and Hankin , it could be argued that anxious users find online dating a form of validation, which can serve as positive social reinforcement that can increase the chances of continuing the use of online dating for longer periods of time, and potentially developing addictive-like patterns of use e.

Another form of problematic use of dating apps, more specifically Tinder, is sex-search use Orosz et al. As previously discussed, sex-search use of online dating has been related to higher measures of sexual permissiveness, sensation-seeking, and lower conscientiousness. Furthermore, in one study, sex addiction was related to greater use of online dating sites Zlot et al. Being a homosexual man has also been related to sex-search motives Clemens et al. The reviewed studies supported an association between dating app use and condomless sex in comparison to non-dating app users, even though there are some studies that did not find this association Heijman et al.

Nonetheless, homosexual men may be at higher risk of problematic use of online dating due to the prominent sex-search motive for online dating. Finding casual sexual partners in online dating services is facilitated by some apps that show how far users are from each other i.

geographical distance. This structural characteristic GPS-based service may be related to higher impulsive decisions and problematic use of online dating. Arguably, by showing up walking-distance profiles, it is easier to engage in casual dates and this may serve as a self-esteem enhancement mechanism, as previously discussed, which may increase engagement and usage of online dating services. However, further research is needed to support this association and how the different structural mechanisms of the respective dating apps affect measures of well being in users.

Previous research has associated sexting with risky sexual behaviour Klettke et al. Sexting through dating applications may as well increase the sex-search motive of users i. casual sex dates which has been found to be a predictor of problematic use of dating apps. However, further study is needed to provide evidence in order to relate chatting through dating apps and sexting, and how this may influence the appearance of sexual behaviour e.

Some of the reviewed studies concerning associated risks converge on the findings that generally online dating users find online dating to have specific risks, including deceit, fear of physical harassment, and financial exploitation. Additionally, there is a body of research that points to the objectifying environment that emerges in online dating e. through using market-like vocabulary and filtering through numerous profiles.

It is of concern that objectification of other users may increase self-objectification Koval et al. Therefore, further research should study the emotional experience of users and consider how longer time of use may influence wellbeing measures and clinical mental health symptoms through self-objectification.

Regarding methodology, some weaknesses limit the strength of the findings in the reviewed studies. First, cross-sectional design prevents from making causality inferences and to know the directionality of the results e. condomless sex leads to using dating apps or using dating apps leads to having condomless sex. Second, some of the measures present limitations which may bias the results e. use of non-validated items, lack of categorisation, and specificity.

Third, some samples limit the external validity of the findings i. convenience samples and specific-population samples. Therefore, it is recommended for further study to i use more diverse samples, ii consider methodologies that can establish causality, and iii collect data using self-reports together with interviews to increase internal validity. In addition to the latter, it could be useful to collect real-life measures of online dating use which assess the temporal stability of usage and may provide some insightful objective data that self-report measures cannot facilitate, such as using the experience sampling method ESM , which is defined as a research procedure by which participants respond to a series of questions multiple times a day during a specific period of time Larson and Csikszentmihalyi All of these proposals would help to overcome the present limitations of these studies and provide more robust insights in the field of online dating utilising the highest standards of empirical research.

This current systematic review presents a number of limitations. First, there are some studies that do not specify whether their findings are based on online dating sites, mobile applications, or both. This is necessary in order to differentiate the distinctive phenomena of each service. Second, online dating services include a great variety of apps and sites; therefore, including all of them under the term online dating services may be reductionist and ignore different processes i.

psychological and behavioural that may arise from their use. Third, due to the paucity in previous research in the field of online dating, some conclusions are based on a limited amount of studies, and further study will be needed in order to support current findings and conclusions.

Lastly, considering that the field of online dating research is growing over time, it is likely that studies under the process of submission or publication have been not included in this review. Online dating has become an extended service across technological societies.

The present review is the first attempt to gather empirical findings regarding the use of online dating services sites and smartphone applications and problematic use of online dating. Findings in this this review indicate that there are personality correlates such as sociability, sensation-seeking, sexual permissiveness, and anxious attachment that correlate to greater use of online dating.

Self-esteem enhancement and sex-search motives have been related to problematic use of online dating more specifically of the dating app Tinder. Raised in Dorset, he holds a BA from The University of Nottingham and an MSc from Lund University School of Economics and Management. Previously he has written about politics, economics and technology for various online publications. Skip to content Written by Scott Harvey 5th January 8th February Literature Review Prepared by University of Waterloo About Literature Reviews This guide will help you to plan and write literature reviews during your post-secondary education.

What will I learn? Prepared by. How is this guide organized? This guide includes six sections: Overview Background information about literature reviews. Planning and Researching Practical steps to plan and complete literature reviews. Parts of a Literature Review Strategies for writing each section of your literature review. Critical Writing Skills Techniques for incorporating your research and using academic writing conventions.

Despite the constant growth in the use of online dating sites and mobile dating applications, research examining potential problematic use of online dating has remained scarce. Findings suggest that personality correlates such as neuroticism, sociability, sensation-seeking, and sexual permissiveness are related to greater use of online dating services.

Sex-search and self-esteem enhancement are predictors of problematic use of online dating. Previous research coincides with online dating risks e. fear of deception and objectification tendency due to online dating services sites and apps design. Observations regarding methodological weaknesses and future research implications are included.

Back in , Match. com was launched for public use as a popular global online dating service. In , location-based smartphone dating applications first appeared, which allowed users to access online dating anytime and anywhere, making them ubiquitous. Regarding the ubiquity of online dating, Jung et al. Greater use of online dating may not necessarily imply the existence of problematic use.

However, previous literature in the field of internet disorders has found that extended use higher frequency of use is related to higher scores on smartphone addiction Haug et al. Yet, extended use is not sufficient to describe problematic use of online dating. Its aetiology and maintenance may be a reflection of diverse factors of different nature i. biological, psychological, and social.

Hence, an interdisciplinary explanation i. biopsychosocial framework is needed. users seeking sex encounters are able to find other users at walking distance. In fact, based on the interaction of person-affect-cognition-execution I-PACE model Brand et al. sadness, frustration and anger and dysfunctional affective and cognitive responses in relation to dating apps e.

In the scope of internet disorders, and more specifically addiction to social networking sites SNSs , previous research has reported that availability increases the number of people engaged in the activity, which can lead to excessive use Kuss and Griffiths In terms of mental health problems, previous literature has noted a positive correlation between depressive symptoms and time spent on SNSs Pantic , the use of smartphones for different purposes, including SNSs and other media services e.

videos and chatrooms before going to sleep has been found to correlate with depressive symptoms and sleep disturbances in adolescent populations Lemola et al. Considering the similarities of SNSs and online dating sites and applications and similar findings in online dating research e. low self-esteem related to higher use of online dating, higher availability of online dating sites leading to longer use , it appears plausible to consider previous research investigating SNSs as a guide for online dating research.

In that sense, Pantic concluded that SNS use has created changes in how individuals relate to each other in the present time making social interactions more shallow and decreasing communication with family members Pantic At the same time, online dating may potentially change the dating scene because of the growth in popularity and ubiquity of the service due to smartphone applications.

Previous literature highlighted that time needed to form long-lasting relationships romantic and platonic is mismatched with the time users spent on online dating for that same purpose establishing a long-term relationship , thus favouring casual encounters over other types of dates Yeo and Fung that may potentially lead to longer-lasting relationships and stronger bonding.

Social changes in relation to dating may not necessarily lead to detrimental effects. However, research is needed to assess what types of changes are produced by the inclusion of online dating in our day-to-day life and how these changes affect individuals in a multidisciplinary perspective.

Contrary to other internet disorders, problematic online dating research is still in its initial stage, and as of today, online dating has not been particularly studied in terms of its problematic use. Considering the extended use that online dating services have in the present, and the concerns at the individual level i.

mental health problems and societal level i. dating scene changes , it seems appropriate to review previous literature in this field attending to the need of formulating new knowledge in relation to online dating use and problematic use. Consequently, the aim of the present paper is to review the empirical evidence examining the use and problematic use of online dating. Considering that previous literature concerning problematic use of online dating is scarce, the structure of this present review has been designed to assess and discuss relevant factors related to online dating use that may serve as the basis for further study of problematic use of online dating.

An extensive literature search in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement PRISMA Moher et al.

The search yielded a total of studies in Web of Science and studies in PsycINFO. A total of studies were identified which produced a final selection of 43 studies after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied see Fig. Studies were excluded if they i primarily concerned cyberbullying and its derivatives, ii primarily concerned scams, and iii did not assess online dating as the main variable under investigation.

This yielded 43 studies see Table 1 , only two of which specifically covered potential addiction to online dating.

This section has been divided into six subsections which cover: i usage and motivation, ii personality correlates, iii negative correlates, iv impulsive behaviour, v substance use and behavioural addictions, and vi problematic use of online dating. A total of eleven studies were found that examined the characteristics of use or motivations of online dating use. Out of the eleven studies, there were ten quantitative studies, all of which were cross-sectional Corriero and Tong ; Gunter ; Hance et al.

One study examined heterosexual respondents only Hwang , and another study focused on male homosexual populations only Corriero and Tong , and the remaining studies did not differentiate between sexual orientations. They were asked to complete an online survey that contained a subscale on active intentions from the Dating Anxiety Survey Calvert et al.

However, there was no difference regarding income or education. Furthermore, in relation to age, it appeared that adults aged between 30 and 50 years were the most active users.

Asians and Latinos and within the same group i. whites with whites. In order to do this, demographic measures i. age, gender, marital status, educational level and zip code of residence were taken; also willingness to date inter- and intra-racially was registered; however, the authors did not specify how they measured that variable willingness to date inter- and intra-racially. Generally, dating online intra-racially was favoured over inter-racial dating.

However, men were found to be higher in willingness to date inter-racially in comparison to women. Nonetheless, considering the specificity of the sample, these results cannot be extrapolated to the general population. Further studies should consider including variability in terms of sexual orientations and cultural background to see if these findings can be replicated. positive distortions towards finding the perfect match.

Taken together, the previous four studies indicate that young adult men are the most active online dating users tending to date intra-racially. However, three of these studies i. Gunter ; Houran and Lange ; Valkenburg and Peter were carried out before the launch of smartphone dating apps, the appearance of which could have resulted in different findings.

Regarding psychological characteristics of users, Kim et al. Furthermore, they found that users high in social skills i. sociability , together with high self-esteem, and high relationship involvement were more likely to use online dating services in comparison to those with high sociability and high relationship involvement but with low self-esteem. On the contrary, individuals with low self-esteem and low relationship involvement together with high sociability were found to be more active users compared to less sociable participants, and those whose self-esteem was high but who scored low on relationship involvement, or vice versa.

To clarify, the effect was only found in the interaction between self-esteem and relationship involvement among those high in sociability. Seemingly, being sociable appears as an important predictor of higher online dating use. In contrast to these results, a small survey by Stinson and Jeske of participants found that peer pressure influenced the decision to use online dating services instead of personality factors e. sociability, introversion. The authors claimed that it may be due to the spreading popularity of online dating that personality features were not as predictive in regard to usage tendency.

In a study of respondents, Menkin et al. Conversely, if users were concerned about their own personal information, health and privacy, then their desire for uncertainty decreased. Therefore, it may be argued that those young users who are looking for casual sex encounters put themselves at higher risk than those who are not looking for sex. This hypothesis is discussed in a later section.

In more general terms, online daters search for companionship, comfort after a life crisis, control over the presentation of oneself to others, to refrain from commitment and societal boundaries, new experiences, and romantic fantasies Lawson and Leck In relation to control over self-presentation, it has been claimed that individuals with high rejection—sensitivity tend to feel more comfortable to express themselves in the online medium, and those who feel more comfortable expressing themselves online are found to score higher on online dating use Hance et al.

One of the reasons for high rejection—sensitive individuals to engage more in the online dating arena may be related to feeling less constrained to show themselves i.

Nonetheless, it appears that common features in online dating like the absence of time limits i. asynchronous communication and selective self-presentation facilitate deceptive representations of oneself Hall et al. In a study of secondary survey data from US participants, Paul found that couples who met online had higher split up rates in comparison to partners who met offline.

Arguably, typical features of online dating services and apps such as asynchronous communication and selective self-presentation may negatively affect the quality of a long-term relationship between two online daters.

Consequently, further studies are needed in the form of longitudinal designs that would help establish the causes that affect the quality of relationships initiated via online dating services. Overall, the results of this subsection show that the use of online dating platforms is widespread and has grown rapidly in the past few years. In terms of use, younger adult men appear to be the most prevalent users of online dating services.

In terms of motivations to use online dating, men favour sex appeal more compared to women. Regarding psychological characteristics, it appears that high sociability and high rejection—sensitivity are associated with higher use of online dating services. The studies reviewed suggest that there are some features in online dating services i.

sites and apps that could enhance the chances of deception and decrease the quality of long-term relationships. Nonetheless, there are some methodological weaknesses e. the use of non-validated psychometric instruments, and non-representative samples that should be amended in future research so that the internal and external validity of these findings are increased.

As to the design, the research should consider longitudinal approaches to help establish the direction of causality i. is relationship quality affected by online dating or are there underlying factors that directly affect relationship quality. Considering the association that exists between specific personality correlates and patterns of use, a total of seven studies Blackhart et al. All the studies assessed used quantitative and cross-sectional methods.

Blackhart et al. This association was also reported in a study of US heterosexual participants Findings suggested that those high in sensation-seeking used online dating apps to look for casual partners and romantic dates Chan The authors also found associations between trust towards people, sensation-seeking, and higher use of smartphones with increased dating app use, and a direct relationship between smartphone use and dating app use.

Arguably, there may be an association between excessive smartphone use and dating app use. They reported a positive correlation between sexual permissiveness and dating app use for casual sex dates.

About This Website,About Literature Reviews

problematic use of online dating is scarce, the structure of this present review has been designed to assess and discuss relevant factors related to online dating use that may serve as the  · From Academia: Gender Differences in Online Dating (Literature Review) Written by Scott Harvey. 5th January A ResearchGate paper analysed the existing  · Physical attractiveness is the key criteria for men; while women, being much more demanding, prioritize socio-economic attributes when choosing a male partner. the negative sides of online dating. It is undeniably that online dating helps a number of people in meeting suitable potential partners and finding love, but at the same time online dating AdDating, Never Been Easier! All The Options are Wating For You in One blogger.comr its instant messaging, video chat, dating games, offline events, or online Zoosk - Best Dating Site - $/month · Match - Best for romance - $/month This guide includes six sections: Overview Background information about literature reviews. Planning and Researching Practical steps to plan and complete literature reviews. Parts of a ... read more

Article Google Scholar Corriero, E. In relation to substance use and online dating among heterosexual populations, data come from only one study that reported no direct relationship Choi et al. Wang, P. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology pp. chat, sharing pictures may increase fantasising about condomless sex. Chen, B.

sex addiction and online dating Zlot et al, online dating literature review. Article Google Scholar Corriero, E. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction1— Nonetheless, caution needs to be used with regard to this assumption because the assessed samples were skewed towards MSM; therefore, generalising the results to the general population is not possible. Further study is needed to online dating literature review the relevant factors that have been suggested as predictors of problematic use, self-esteem and sex-searching motives, with a cross-cultural approach in order to inform of possible cultural differences in relation to problematic use.

Categories: